FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy!

[Tiggi]

G'n'R are Gun and Roses.

I know, Alex.

I was being facetious. My talent is wasted on here...

[trbc08]

I'm sorry, haha. It's hard to read intent in text, as I'm sure you know.

[Palmer]

My talent is wasted on here...

ohhh never honey ::

[Tiggi]

I'm sorry, haha. It's hard to read intent in text, as I'm sure you know.

I know it is, Alex.

No problem, and no apology needed.

If I appear to make stupid comments, always assume I'm being ironic. That way everyone will think I'm smarter than I actually am !!

[Tiggi]

ohhh never honey ::

Why Thank You, Little Miss Canada !!

[CMB1888]

I'm sorry, haha. It's hard to read intent in text, as I'm sure you know.

I've always thought that we are in dire need of a 'sarcasm' font

[Iota]

For you unenlightened people: http://www.sarcasmsociety.com/sarcasm/

Maybe some lessons on sarcasm may help you to uncover it...

[trbc08]

For you unenlightened people: http://www.sarcasmsociety.com/sarcasm/

Maybe some lessons on sarcasm may help you to uncover it...

Hmm... Being patronizing... How quaint!

[Iota]

I just wanted to help you escape the pit of nescience so you can bask in the glow of greater knowledge.

[trbc08]

Well, that implies that you can actually be objective about sarcasm and whether a statement is sarcastic or not, if you're a person other than the person who is being sarcastic. I don't think my relative inability to ascertain someone's sarcasm, much less on the interwebs, makes me more or less ignorant than someone else. Or maybe it does? I don't think you can determine my level of ignorance based on a completely subjective matter (i.e. deducing whether something is sarcastic or not, without the input of the person who is being sarcastic/not sarcastic).