21-09-2011, 18:45
I respect your opinion , J ! Is it Keith RICHARD of RICHARDS....I've seen it spelled both ways back and forth forever !!!!!
Jerome Wrote:Sorry have to disagree there Steve. While the rest are certainly proficient on their respective instruments, Keith Richards was mediocre at best. He was just a party animal that happened to land up in a band that was popular. I have watched a couple of the bands performances and Keith Richards brings nothing to the table. Ron Wood & Mick Taylor were carrying him all the way. He could barely play the three chords he knew properly.
The ultimate connection is between a performer and its' audience!

