![]() |
|
FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - Printable Version +- Music Discussion (https://www.music-discussion.com) +-- Forum: Music Discussion (https://www.music-discussion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Hard Rock/Metal (https://www.music-discussion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=20) +--- Thread: FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! (/showthread.php?tid=863) |
FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - Tiggi - 22-11-2008 trbc08 Wrote:G'n'R are Gun and Roses. I know, Alex. I was being facetious. My talent is wasted on here... FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - trbc08 - 22-11-2008 I'm sorry, haha. It's hard to read intent in text, as I'm sure you know. FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - Palmer - 23-11-2008 Tiggi Wrote:My talent is wasted on here... ohhh never honey : :
FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - Tiggi - 23-11-2008 trbc08 Wrote:I'm sorry, haha. It's hard to read intent in text, as I'm sure you know. I know it is, Alex. No problem, and no apology needed. If I appear to make stupid comments, always assume I'm being ironic. That way everyone will think I'm smarter than I actually am !! FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - Tiggi - 23-11-2008 Palmer Wrote:ohhh never honey : Why Thank You, Little Miss Canada !! FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - CMB1888 - 23-11-2008 trbc08 Wrote:I'm sorry, haha. It's hard to read intent in text, as I'm sure you know. I've always thought that we are in dire need of a 'sarcasm' font FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - Iota - 24-11-2008 For you unenlightened people: http://www.sarcasmsociety.com/sarcasm/ Maybe some lessons on sarcasm may help you to uncover it... FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - trbc08 - 24-11-2008 Quote: Hmm... Being patronizing... How quaint! FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - Iota - 24-11-2008 I just wanted to help you escape the pit of nescience so you can bask in the glow of greater knowledge. FINALLY!! Chinese Democracy! - trbc08 - 24-11-2008 Well, that implies that you can actually be objective about sarcasm and whether a statement is sarcastic or not, if you're a person other than the person who is being sarcastic. I don't think my relative inability to ascertain someone's sarcasm, much less on the interwebs, makes me more or less ignorant than someone else. Or maybe it does? I don't think you can determine my level of ignorance based on a completely subjective matter (i.e. deducing whether something is sarcastic or not, without the input of the person who is being sarcastic/not sarcastic). |