Title really explains it, which do you think is better? recorded? or live? or recorded live? etc....
Record companies change the sound of a note as it is recorded to make it "perfect" does this inprove the sound? or take away part of the soul of the song?
in my humble opinion, music that is edited dureing the record does indeed take away something away from the music, humanity is anything but perfect so why should our music be? thats my logic but there we go!
Or do you totally disagree with me and think that a little tweaking goes a long way?
is a band poo if they sound compleatly differant to thier albem?
MUSE is the only example i can use, as the songs that they play live may have a fundermentle simmerlarity with the ones on the albem, and yet they are compleately differant to listen to.
thoughts, views and abuse *insert below* please